Building a Vision for Reproducibility in the Cyberinfrastructure Ecosystem: Leveraging Community Efforts


  • Dylan Chapp University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Victoria Stodden National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
  • Michela Taufer University of Tennessee, Knoxville



The scientific computing community has long taken a leadership role in understanding and assessing the relationship of reproducibility to cyberinfrastructure, ensuring that computational results - such as those from simulations - are "reproducible", that is, the same results are obtained when one re-uses the same input data, methods, software and analysis conditions. Starting almost a decade ago, the community has regularly published and advocated for advances in this area. In this article we trace this thinking and relate it to current national efforts, including the 2019 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report on "Reproducibility and Replication in Science".

To this end, this work considers high performance computing workflows that emphasize workflows combining traditional simulations (e.g. Molecular Dynamics simulations) with in situ analytics. We leverage an analysis of such workflows to (a) contextualize the 2019 National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report's recommendations in the HPC setting and (b) envision a path forward in the tradition of community driven approaches to reproducibility and the acceleration of science and discovery. The work also articulates avenues for future research at the intersection of transparency, reproducibility, and computational infrastructure that supports scientific discovery.


Aasi, J., Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., et al.: The LIGO scientific collaboration. Classical and Quantum Gravity 32(7), 074001 (2015), DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001

Acernese, F., Agathos, M., Agatsuma, K., et al.: Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Class.Quant. Grav. 32, 2 32(2) (2015), DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001

Adorf, C.S., Dodd, P.M., Ramasubramani, V., et al.: Simple data and workflow management with the signac framework. Computational Materials Science 146, 220–229 (2018), DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.035

Bailey, D., Barrio, R., Borwein, J.: High-precision computation: Mathematical physics and dynamics. Applied Mathematics and Computation 218(20), 10106–10121 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.03.087

Barba, L.A.: SC reproducibility initiative author-kit. (2013)

Barba, L.A.: The hard road to reproducibility. Science 354(6308), 142–142 (2016)

Brinckman, A., Chard, K., Gaffney, N., et al.: Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “Whole Tale”. Future Generation Comp. Syst. 94, 854–867 (2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.12.029

Brumfiel, G.: Neutrinos not faster than light. ICARUS experiment contradicts controversial claim. Nature (2012)

Buckheit, J.B., Donoho, D.L.: WaveLab and Reproducible Research, pp. 55–81. Springer, New York, NY (1995), DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_5

Canon, R.S., Younge, A.: A case for portability and reproducibility of HPC containers. In: IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Containers and New Orchestration Paradigms for Isolated Environments in HPC, CANOPIE-HPC, 18 Nov. 2019, Denver, CO, USA. pp. 49–54. IEEE (2019), DOI: 10.1109/CANOPIE-HPC49598.2019.00012

Chapp, D., Johnston, T., Taufer, M.: On the need for reproducible numerical accuracy through intelligent runtime selection of reduction algorithms at the extreme scale. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing. pp. 166–175 (2015), DOI: 10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.34

Chapp, D., Rorabaugh, D., Brown, D.A., et al.: Applicability study of the PRIMAD model to LIGO gravitational wave search workflows. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Practical Reproducible Evaluation of Computer Systems, P-RECS@HPDC 2019. pp. 1–6 (2019), DOI: 10.1145/3322790.3330591

Chapp, D., Sato, K., Ahn, D., et al.: Record-and-replay techniques for HPC systems: A survey. Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations 5(1), 11–30 (2018), DOI: 10.14529/jsfi180102

Chard, K., Gaffney, N., Hatigan, M., et al.: Toward enabling reproducibility for data-intensive research using the Whole Tale platform. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Computing, PARCO 2019. Advances in Parallel Computing, IOS Press (2019)

Chard, K., Gaffney, N., Jones, M.B., et al.: Implementing computational reproducibility in the Whole Tale environment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Practical Reproducible Evaluation of Computer Systems, P-RECS ’19. pp. 17–22. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019), DOI: 10.1145/3322790.3330594

Chen, X., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Dasler, R. et al.: Open is not enough. Nature Physics 15, 113–119 (2019), DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0342-2

Chirigati, F., Shasha, D., Freire, J.: Reprozip: Using provenance to support computational reproducibility. In: Presented as part of the 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance. USENIX (2013)

Claebout, J.: Hypertext documents about reproducible research (1994),

Claerbout, J.F., Karrenbach, M.: Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, pp. 601–604. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (1992), DOI: 10.1190/1.1822162

Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Juve, G., et al.: Pegasus: a workflow management system for science automation. Future Generation Computer Systems 46, 17–35 (2015), DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2014.10.008

Demmel, J., Nguyen, H.D.: Fast reproducible floating-point summation. In: 2013 IEEE 21st Symposium on Computer Arithmetic, 7-10 April 2013, Austin, TX, USA. pp. 163–172. IEEE (2013), DOI: 10.1109/ARITH.2013.9

Donoho, D.L., Maleki, A., Rahman, I.U., Shahram, M., Stodden, V.: Reproducible research in computational harmonic analysis. Computing in Science Engineering 11(1), 8–18 (2009), DOI: 10.1109/MCSE.2009.15

Forde, J., Head, T., Holdgraf, C., et al.: Reproducible research environments with repo2docker. In: ICML 2018 Reproducible Machine Learning. ICML (2018)

Freire, J., Fuhr, N., Rauber, A.: Reproducibility of Data-Oriented Experiments in e-Science (Dagstuhl Seminar 16041). Dagstuhl Reports 6(1), 108–159 (2016), DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.6.1.108

Gamblin, T., LeGendre, M., Collette, M.R., et al.: The Spack package manager: bringing order to HPC software chaos. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC’15, 15-20 Nov. 2015, Austin, TX, USA. pp. 1–12. IEEE (2015), DOI: 10.1145/2807591.2807623

Gopalakrishnan, G., Hovland, P.D., Iancu, C., et al.: Report of the HPC correctness summit, Jan 25–26, 2017, Washington, DC. CoRR abs/1705.07478 (2017),

He, Y., Ding, C.H.: Using accurate arithmetics to improve numerical reproducibility and stability in parallel applications. The Journal of Supercomputing 18(3), 259–277 (2001), DOI: 10.1023/A:1008153532043

Honarmand, N., Torrellas, J.: Replay debugging: Leveraging record and replay for program debugging. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 42(3), 445–456 (2014), DOI: 10.1145/2678373.2665737

James, D., Wilkins-Diehr, N., Stodden, V., Colbry, D., Rosales, C., et al.: Standing together for reproducibility in large-scale computing: Report on reproducibility@xsede. CoRR abs/1412.5557 (2014),

Jimenez, I., Arpaci-Dusseau, A., Arpaci-Dusseau, R., et al.: PopperCI: Automated reproducibility validation. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, INFOCOM WKSHPS, 1-4 May 2017, Atlanta, GA, USA. pp. 450–455. IEEE (2017), DOI: 10.1109/INFCOMW.2017.8116418

Jimenez, I., Sevilla, M., Watkins, N., et al.: The Popper convention: Making reproducible systems evaluation practical. In: 2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops, IPDPSW, 29 May-2 June 2017, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA. pp. 1561–1570. IEEE (2017), DOI: 10.1109/IPDPSW.2017.157

Mirowski, P.: The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science 48(2), 171–203 (2018), DOI: 10.1177/0306312718772086

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2019), DOI: 10.17226/25303

Peng, R.D.: Reproducible research and biostatistics. Biostatistics 10(3), 405–408 (2009), DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp014

Sato, K., Laguna, I., Lee, G.L., et al.: PRUNERS: Providing reproducibility for uncovering non-deterministic errors in runs on supercomputers. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 33(5), 777–783 (2019), DOI: 10.1177/1094342019834621

Sawaya, G., Bentley, M., Briggs, I., et al.: FLiT: Cross-platform floating-point resultconsistency tester and workload. In: 2017 IEEE international symposium on workload characterization, IISWC, 1-3 Oct. 2017, Seattle, WA, USA. pp. 229–238. IEEE (2017), DOI: 10.1109/IISWC.2017.8167780

Schwab, M., Karrenbach, N., Claerbout, J.: Making scientific computations reproducible. Computing in Science Engineering 2(6), 61–67 (2000), DOI: 10.1109/5992.881708

Stodden, V.: Resolving irreproducibility in empirical and computational research. IMS Bulletin (November 2013),

Stodden, V., Borwein, J., Bailey, D.H.: Setting the default to reproducible in computational science research. SIAM News 46(5), 4–6 (2013),

Stodden, V., Krafczyk, M.: Assessing reproducibility: An astrophysical example of computational uncertainty in the HPC context. In: The 1st Workshop on Reproducible, Customizable and Portable Workflows for HPC, HPC18 (2018)

Stodden, V., Leisch, F., Peng, R.D.: Implementing Reproducible Research. The R Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC (2014)

Stodden, V., McNutt, M., Bailey, D.H., et al.: Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science 354(6317), 1240–1241 (2016), DOI: 10.1126/science.aah6168

Stodden, V., Miguez, S.: Best practices for computational science: Software infrastructure and environments for reproducible and extensible research. Journal of Open Research Software 2(1) (2014), DOI: 10.5334/jors.ay

Taufer, M., Anderson, D., Cicotti, P., et al.: Homogeneous redundancy: A technique to ensure integrity of molecular simulation results using public computing. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 4-8 April 2005, Denver, CO, USA. IEEE (2005), DOI: 10.1109/IPDPS.2005.247

Thomas, S., Wyatt, M., Do, T.M.A., et al.: Characterizing in situ and in transit analytics of molecular dynamics simulations for next generation supercomputers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on eScience, eScience’19, 24-27 Sept. 2019, San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 188–198. IEEE (2019), DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2019.00027

Wild, S.: Irreproducible astronomy. Physics Today (2018), DOI: 10.1063/PT.6.1.20180404a




How to Cite

Chapp, D., Stodden, V., & Taufer, M. (2020). Building a Vision for Reproducibility in the Cyberinfrastructure Ecosystem: Leveraging Community Efforts. Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations, 7(1), 112–129.

Most read articles by the same author(s)